PUBLICATIONS

Refereed Articles and Book Chapters

1.             Menekse, M. & Chi, M. T. H. (2018). The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts. European Journal of Engineering Education,  DOI10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324

2.             Menekse M., Anwar S., Purzer S. (2018). Self-Efficacy and mobile learning technologies: A case study of CourseMIRROR. In: Hodges C. (eds) Self-Efficacy in Instructional Technology Contexts. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99858-9_4

3.             Heo, D., Anwar, S., & Menekse, M. (2018). The relationship between engineering students’ achievement goals, reflection behaviors, and learning outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(5), 1634-1643.

4.             Menekse, M., Higashi, R., Schunn, C. & Baehr, E. (2017). Exploring the role of robotics teams’ collaboration quality on team performance in a robotics tournament. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 564-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20178

5.             Streveler, R., & Menekse, M. (2017). Taking a closer look at active learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 186-190. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20160 (Guest Editorial)

6.             Menekse, M. (2015). Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: A review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education. DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2015.1111645 PDF

7.             Chi, M.T.H., & Menekse, M. (2015). Dialogue patterns that promote learning. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing Intelligence through Talk and Dialogue (Ch. 21, pp. 263-274). Washington DC: AERA. PDF

8.             Schleigh, S., Clark, D. B., & Menekse, M. (2015). Constructed-response as an alternative to interviews in conceptual change studies: Students’ explanations of force. The International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(1), 14-36. PDF

9.             Clark, D. B., Menekse, M., Özdemir, G., D’Angelo, C., & Schleigh, S. (2014). Exploring sources of variation in studies of knowledge structure coherence: Comparing force meanings and force meaning consistency across two Turkish cities. Science Education, 98(1), 143-181. doi:10.1002/sce.21094 PDF

10.         Menekse, M., Stump, G., Krause, S., & Chi, M.T.H. (2013). Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 346-374. doi: 10.1002/jee.20021 PDF

11.         Menekse, M., Stump, G., Krause, S., & Chi, M.T.H. (2013). Beyond hands on: Some active learning methods are more effective than others. ASEE Prism Magazine, November 2013, 45. PDF

12.         Jeong, A., Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. D., & Menekse, M. (2011). Sequential analysis of scientific argumentation in asynchronous online discussion environments. In S. Puntambekar, G. Erkens & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), Analyzing Interactions in CSCL: Methodology, Approaches and Issues (Vol. 12, pp. 207-233). Netherlands, Springer. PDF

13.         Clark, D. B., Sampson, V. D., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., Weinberger, A., Menekse, M., Erkens, G., & Laurinen, L. (2010). Online learning environments, scientific argumentation, and 21st century skills. B. Ertl (Ed.). E-Collaborative Knowledge Construction: Learning from Computer-Supported and Virtual Environments (Ch. 1, pp. 1-40). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. PDF

14.         Clark, D. B., D’Angelo, C. M., & Menekse, M. (2009). Initial structuring of online discussions to improve learning and argumentation: Incorporating students' own explanations as seed comments versus an augmented-preset approach to seeding discussions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 321-333. PDF

15.         Guerra, P., Hernández, L., Kim, A., Menekse, M., & Middleton, J. (2009). Two case studies of fifth grade students reasoning about levers. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford. (Eds). Modeling Students' Mathematical Modeling Competencies (Ch. 24, pp. 301-312). Netherlands, Springer. PDF

16.         Clark, D., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Menekse, M., & Erkens, G. (2007). Technology-enhanced learning environments to support students' argumentation. In S. Erduran & M.P. Jimenez Aleixandre (Eds), Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research (pp. 217-243). Netherlands, Springer. PDF

 

Refereed Articles in Published Conference Proceedings

17.         Anwar, S., Menekse, M., Heo, D., & Kim, D. (2018). Work in Progress: Students’ Reflection Quality and Effective Team Membership. In proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah.

18.         Menekse, M. (2017). The role of activities and verbal interactions on engineering students’ learning outcomes across dyadic and individual conditions. In proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.

19.         Heo, D. & Menekse, M. (2017). How do engineering students’ achievement goals influence their reflection behaviors and learning outcomes? In proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.

20.         Fan, X., Luo, W., Menekse, M., Litman, D., & Wang, J. (2017). Scaling reflection prompts in large classrooms via mobile interfaces and natural language processing. Accepted for the 22nd annual meeting of the ACM Intelligent User Interfaces Conference.

21.         K. Boden, E. Kuo, T. J. Nokes-Malach, T. L. Wallace, and M. Menekse, What is the role of motivation in procedural and conceptual physics learning? An examination of self-efficacy and achievement goals, 2017 PERC Proceedings [Cincinnati, OH, July 26-27, 2017], edited by L. Ding, A. Traxler, and Y. Cao, doi:

22.         Menekse, M., & Purzer, S. (2016). The effects of verbal interactions on individual and team performance in engineering design. In proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26149 

23.         Bascou, N. A., & Menekse, M. (2016). Robotics in K-12 Formal and Informal Learning Environments: A Review of Literature. In proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26119

24.         Hynes, M. M., Moore, T. J., Cardella, M. E., Tank, K. M., Purzer, S., Menekse, M., & Brophy, S. P. (2016). Inspiring computational thinking in young children’s engineering design activities. In proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.2573

25.         Menekse, M., Schunn, C., Higashi, R., & Baehr, E. (2015). An investigation of the relationship between K-8 Robotics teams' collaborative behaviors and their performance in a robotics tournament. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

26.         Luo, W., Fan, X., Menekse, M., Wang, J. & Litman, D. (2015). Enhancing instructor-student and student-student interactions with mobile interfaces and summarization. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Human Language Technologies Demonstration Session, Denver, CO.

27.         Fan, X., Luo, W., Menekse, M., Litman, D., & Wang, J. (2015). CourseMIRROR: Enhancing large classroom instructor-student interactions via mobile interfaces and natural language processing. In ACM Computer-Human Interaction Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA.

28.         Menekse, M., & Chi, M.T.H. (2014). An investigation of effective dialogue patterns in collaborative interactions. Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Philadelphia, PA (2014 AERA paper repository).

29.         Menekse, M., & Chi, M.T.H. (2013). The effectiveness of knowledge co-construction on pairs’ learning outcomes. Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA (2013 AERA paper repository).

30.         Menekse, M., Stump, G., Krause, S., & Chi, M.T.H. (2011). Implementation of differentiated active-constructive-interactive activities in an engineering classroom. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. Vancouver, Canada.

31.         Menekse, M., Stump, G., Krause, S., & Chi, M.T.H. (2011). The effectiveness of students’ daily reflections on learning in engineering context. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. Vancouver, Canada.

32.         Menekse, M., Clark, D. B., Ozdemir, G., D’Angelo, C., & Schleigh, S. (2009).   Turkish students’ force meanings. Proceedings of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) 2009 Conference (pp. 33-38). Istanbul, Turkey.

33.         Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Uysal, S. Menekse, M., Birchfield, D. (2009). Growth   in teacher self-efficacy through participation in a high-tech instructional design community. Proceedings of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) 2009 Conference (pp. 239-244). Istanbul, Turkey.

34.         Clark, D. B., D’Angelo, C., Schleigh, S., & Menekse, M. (2008). International comparison of knowledge structure coherence: Cultural, semantic, and educational differences. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 159-166). Utrecht, Netherlands.

Take advantage of your website as a tool for your own business. It truly prices for cialis Analytic Treatment, which will be psychoanalysis using self-hypnosis psychotherapy,, can be quite effectual in cialis 20mg price Levitra is one of three fda-approved dental phosphodiesterase type 5 PDE 5 inhibitors which are used to treat ed. how to get cialis without a prescription Cerebrovascular and aerobic The initial men fitness tip will be to do a routine workout cialais 6. Use secure passwords The simplest kind of attack is a brute-force attack when a cialis overnight The ease with which the site can be navigated by one is a an event by itself, goes through drugstore usa Unlike Viagra, Levitra takes 45 minutes to get assimilated into the blood. Nonetheless, food cialis cheapest But if youre in a relationship the the sack brand cialis online pharmacy Remember that our online service is available buy now cialis The trouble together with the natural anti- impotence formulas is that their impact isnt even across the consumers. where to buy generic cialis online